Baseline undisturbed behavior and social patterns of blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (B. physalus) are not well described and are needed to identify and understand potential effects of anthropogenic activities. Behavioral data for blue and fin whales were collected during line-transect and focal-follow effort. Initially observed behavior state, heading, and minimum and maximum interindividual dispersal distance were recorded during line-transect sampling. Focal groups were circled for 10-60+ minutes and videotaped from outside Snell’s sound cone to avoid disturbance. During 24,736 km of survey effort, 51 fin whale sightings (85 individuals) and 49 blue whalesightings (81 individuals) were seen. Over 7 hours of video was collected for16 blue and 15 fin focal follows. During the summer seasons, blues (n=48) were seen more commonly than fins (n=35); in fall, fins (n=16) were seen significantly more frequently than blues (n=1). Mean group size was 1.7 whales for both species. Initially observed blue behavior was usually travel (85%) or mill (11%). Observed fin whale behavior was also mostly travel (90%), mill (4%), or surface-active travel (4%). Both species were seen socializing in fall but not summer; foraging was observed in summer through fall. Mean initial dispersal for blues and fins was 9.1 and 14.2 body lengths, respectively. In summer, blues were most frequently (26%) seen headed S; in fall (n=2), they were headed only inshore (E). In summer, fin whales were most commonly headed SSW (26%) or WNW (26%); in fall, they were headed mostly NE (38%) or WSW (38%). Dive/respiration/behavioral event rates were also collected. Both species may directly compete for food based on observations of inter-specific maneuvering for a bait ball. Data represent the most extensive record of systematic undisturbed behavior on these species in SOCAL and include social interactions not previously documented in this region.

Baseline undisturbed behavior and social patterns of blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (B. physalus) are not well described and are needed to identify and understand potential effects of anthropogenic activities in the SCB. In 2008-2012, 72,467 km of aerial line transect and focal-follow effort was conducted in the SCB. Initially observed location, group size, behavior state, heading, and minimum and maximum inter-individual dispersal distance were recorded. Focal groups were circled for 10-60+ minutes and videotaped from outside the plane’s sound cone to avoid disturbance. A total of 122 fin whale sightings (208 individuals) and 65 blue whale sightings (104 individuals) were made. Behavior, occurrence and distribution were related to season, location, bathymetry, and time of day. Blue whales were seen only from summer-fall and concentrated primarily close to shore (

Baseline undisturbed behavior/social patterns of blue/fin whales are not well described and are needed to identify and understand potential effects of anthropogenic activities. Behavioral data were collected during aerial effort. Initially observed behavior state, heading, minimum/maximum inter-individual dispersal distance were recorded during line-transect sampling. During the summer seasons, blues were seen more than fins; in fall, fins were seen more. Initially observed blue behavior was usually travel or mill. Observed fin behavior was mostly travel, mill, or surface-active travel. Both species were seen socializing in fall but not summer; foraging was observed in summer through fall. In summer, blues were seen headed S; in fall, headed inshore. In summer, fins were headed SSW or WNW; in fall, they were headed NE or WSW. Data represent the most extensive record of systematic undisturbed behavior on these species in SOCAL and include social interactions not previously documented in this region.

Baseline undisturbed behavior and social patterns of blue (Ba/aenoptera musculus) and fin whales (8. physa/us) are not well described and are needed to identify and understand potential effects of anthropogenic activities. Behavioral data for blue and fin whales were collected during aerial survey line-transect and focal-follow effort. Initially-observed behavior state, group size, heading, and minimum and maximum inter-individual dispersal distance were recorded during line-transect sampling and / or subsequent verification circling by the aircraft. Focal groups were circled for 3- 60+ minutes and videotaped from outside Snell's sound cone to avoid disturbance. During 24,736 km of survey effort, 51 fin whale sightings (86 individuals) and 49 blue whale sightings (84 individuals) were seen . Over 7 hours of video was collected for 16 blue and 15 fin focal follows. During the summer, blues (n=48) were seen more commonly than fins (n=35); in fall, fins (n=16) were seen much more frequently than blues (n= 1 ). Mean group size was 1. 7 whales for both species. Initially observed blue behavior was usually travel (85%) or mill (11%). Observed fin whale behavior was also mostly travel (87%), mill (6%), or surface-active travel (3%). Both species were seen socializing (e.g., touching) in fall but not summer; foraging was observed in summer through fall. Mean initial dispersal for blues and fins was 8 and 16 body lengths, respectively. In summer, blues were most frequently (26%) seen headed S; in fall (n=2), they were headed only inshore (E). In summer, fin whales were most commonly headed SSW (26%) or WNW (26%); in fall, they were headed mostly NE (38%) or WSW (38%). Both species directly compete for food based on observations of inter-specific maneuvering for a bait ball. Data represent the most extensive record of systematic undisturbed behavior on these species in SOCAL and include social interactions not previously documented in this region. Dive / respiration / behavioral event rates were also collected and are currently being analyzed. Bacon, C., M.A. Smultea, B. Wursig, K. Lomac-MacNair, and J. Black.

Effects of mixed-species associations (MSA [at least two differentspecies swimming together and/or interacting]) on cetacean behavior rarely have been quantified, but are important for identifying and differentiating potential anthropogenic impacts. Baseline marine mammal behavior was assessed during 77,390 km of U.S. Navy supported aerial line-transect surveys in the Southern California Bight during 2008-2013. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess effects of MSA on group size, maximum nearest neighbor distance (a “cohesion” index, in body lengths), behavior state, and heading. Two percent (43) of 2,330 sightings were MSA involving 13 species (5 baleen whales, 7 toothed whales, 1 pinniped). Behavior and group size of some species differed significantly in MSA vs. non-MSA. MSA were predominated by Risso’s dolphins (44%; 19 of 43 MSA). Risso’s dolphins were most frequently associated with bottlenose dolphins (37% of 19 Risso’s MSA groups) followed by northern right whale dolphins (NRWD; 3% of 19). Risso’s dolphins tended to change headings more often in MSA (p

This study investigates mixed-species associations among marine mammals in the Southern California Bight, focusing specifically on Risso's dolphins (Grampus griseus). Over a six-year period, aerial surveys were conducted to record the frequency and nature of these associations, revealing that Risso's dolphins were the most commonly observed species in mixed interactions. The results indicate a significant decline in the proportion of Risso's dolphins involved in such associations compared to historical records, possibly due to an increase in their relative abundance. The findings underline the importance of monitoring mixed-species associations to understand marine mammal dynamics and ecological interactions.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex from January 2013 to June 2017 to detect marine mammal sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at four locations: west of San Clemente Island (1,000 m depth, site H), south of San Clemente Island (1200 m depth, site N), northwest of San Clemente Island (900 m depth, site M) and west of La Jolla, California (500 m depth, site P).

We present progress on the development of methods to investigate the potential impacts of sonar and other anthropogenic activities on calling animals. The basis for this effort is previously collected PAM data from four sites in the years 2006 to 2015. Recording effort at these sites varied between 674 and 2,284 days per site, resulting in 19 years of cumulative acoustic recording during 79 instrument deployments and 227 TB of acoustic recordings. As part of the work in this progress report, automated routines have been established and/or modified to detect and classify acoustic signals of blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) and Cuvier’s beaked whales (Ziphius caviostris) as well as Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar pings and explosions.

Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) provides extensive datasets to examine the behavioral response of cetaceans to anthropogenic sound. Using broadband passive acoustic monitoring, the full range of cetacean sounds and the sounds of naval and other anthropogenic sources are recorded. We have been collecting high-frequency PAM data in the Southern California (SOCAL) region since 2006. Within this dataset are many instances of anthropogenic sound as well as cetacean presence at the locations of naval training.

The overall goal of this study was to include the 2018 survey data in the previous 1991–2014 modeling dataset in order to improve SMDs for the CCE study area. Specific objectives included: Generating multi-year average density surfaces for the Navy and others to use in their long-term (2–7 year) environmental planning efforts; and Providing updated abundance and “minimum population size (Nmin)” estimates as defined in the Guidelines for Assessing Marine Mammal Stocks (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2016).

Rapid progress and affordability of photographic technology with increasing improvements in image resolution have facilitated advancements in efficiency and alternative approaches in data collection for marine mamma ls. We report these recent improvements by comparing marine mammal photographs taken during 2008-2013 aerial surveys of 16 marine mammal species in the Southern California Bight, shore-based studies of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Galveston Bay, Texas (2011 - 2013), and gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) off Sakhalin Island, Russia (2004 -2010).

In marine ecosystems, cetaceans are large mobile predators that depend on maximizing foraging efficiency. Their presence within a habitat can therefore be strongly related to the modulation of local prey by oceanographic conditions. Understanding how cetaceans are impacted by prey responses to the physical environment is challenging due to the difficulty of collecting presence data of cetaceans and their prey over long, comparable time periods. We used passive and active acoustic recordings collected from moorings within the San Diego Trough, along with physical oceanographic sampling (i.e. in situ, satellite-derived, and ocean general circulation model measurements), to elucidate relationships between cetaceans, their prey, and the physical environment. Our results show that the predator-prey dynamics of some cetaceans within the San Diego Trough are influenced by seasonal changes in the physical oceanographic conditions and processes that shape their prey resources. Specifically, common dolphin Delphinus delphis foraging activity increased during conditions associated with increased presence of diel vertically migrating fish prey. Blue whale Balaenoptera musculus foraging-associated acoustic activity increased during periods with increased presence of mid-water crustacean zooplankton and was replaced with breeding-associated acoustic activity during conditions associated with the waning of mid-water crustacean zooplankton. Fin whale B. physalus foraging-associated calling activity was more complex to model, most likely because these animals have a generalist diet and occupy this area year-round. Our results highlight environmental conditions and features relevant to cetaceans inhabiting this region and may aid in developing better spatially explicit management actions.

The Hawaiian Islands Cetacean and Ecosystem Assessment Survey (HICEAS) is a recurring ship-based, line-transect survey designed to estimate cetacean abundance in the entirety of the Hawaiian EEZ.

The present study provides new and current estimates of cetacean density for the six most commonly encountered cetacean species off southern California based on sighting data collected during 37 quarterly CalCOFI cruises from 2004 to 2013. The current study resulted from a high survey repetition rate that allowed for the examination of inter-annual and seasonal trends in density as well as temporal and spatial patterns of distribution for six common cetacean species off southern California: blue whales, fin whales, humpback whales, short-beaked common dolphins, Pacific white-sided dolphins, and Dall’s porpoise.

Cetacean distribution, density and abundance in the Southern California Bight were assessed through visual and acoustic surveys during five California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) cruises from August 2012-November 2013. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect protocol during all daylight transits while acoustic monitoring employed a towed hydrophone array during transits and sonobuoys at oceanographic sampling stations. Visual effort included 584 observation hours covering 10,900 kilometers yielding 565 sightings of 15 identified cetacean species.

Spatial and temporal distribution patterns, density and abundance of cetaceans in the southern California Bight were assessed through visual and acoustic surveys during five California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) cruises from August 2011 – July 2012. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect protocol during all daylight transits while acoustic monitoring employed a towed hydrophone array during transits and sonobuoys at oceanographic sampling stations.

Trends in cetacean density and distribution off southern California were assessed through visual line-transect surveys during thirty-seven California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) cruises from July 2004–November 2013. From sightings of the six most commonly encountered cetacean species, seasonal, annual and overall density estimates were calculated. Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus), fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) and humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) were the most frequently sighted baleen whales with overall densities of 0.91/1000km2 (CV=0.27), 2.73/1000km2 (CV=0.19), and 1.17/1000km2 (CV=0.21) respectively. Species specific density estimates, stratified by cruise, were analyzed using a generalized additive model to estimate long-term trends and correct for seasonal imbalances. Variances were estimated using a non-parametric bootstrap with one day of effort as the sampling unit. Blue whales were primarily observed during summer and fall while fin and humpback whales were observed year-round with peaks in density during summer and spring respectively. Short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis), Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) and Dall’s porpoise (Phocoenoidesdalli) were the most frequently encountered small cetaceans with overall densities of 705.83/1000km2 (CV=0.22), 51.98/1000km2 (CV=0.27), and 21.37/1000km2 (CV=0.19) respectively. Seasonally, short-beaked common dolphins were most abundant in winter whereas Pacific white-sided dolphins and Dall’s porpoise were most abundant during spring. There were no significant long-term changes in blue whale, fin whale, humpback whale, short-beaked common dolphin or Dall’s porpoise densities while Pacific white-sided dolphins exhibited a significant decrease in density across the ten-year study. The results from this study were fundamentally consistent with earlier studies, but provide greater temporal and seasonal resolution. Keywords: Cetaceans; Line transect; Density; Abundance; Distribution; Trends; Southern California; CalCOFI

This project is intended to provide baseline information on the species composition, density, distribution, and basic behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present within the United States (U.S.) Navy’s Virginia Capes (VACAPES) Operating Area (OPAREA). This study is part of a larger, multi-institutional, marine mammal and sea turtle monitoring program of U.S. Navy range complexes along the U.S. Atlantic Coast and Gulf of Mexico supporting Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing (AFTT)

This study assesses the acoustic presence of humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), sei (B. borealis), fin (B. physalus), and blue whales (B. musculus) over a decade, based on daily detections of their vocalizations.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC) from September 14, 2012 until June 30, 2013. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at the shelf slope near Quinault Canyon. Data analysis methods consisted of detection of sounds by analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and by automated computer algorithms when possible. The data were divided into three frequency bands for analysis of marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Gulf of Alaska Temporary Maritime Activities Area (GATMAA) from June 2013 to May 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at five locations: a shelf site offshore Kenai Peninsula (200 m depth, site CA), a continental slope site in deep water (850 m depth, site CB), a slope site offshore Kodiak Island (230 m depth, site KO), a deep offshore site at Pratt Seamount (1000 m depth, site PT), and a deep offshore site at Quinn Seamount (930 m depth, site QN).

Cetacean distribution, density and abundance in the Southern California Bight were assessed through visual and acoustic surveys during eighteen California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) cruises from February 2012-April 2016. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect protocol during all daylight transits while acoustic monitoring employed a towed hydrophone array during transits and sonobuoys deployed at oceanographic sampling stations. Visual effort included 2,031 observation hours covering 31,807 kilometers. A total of 1,914 sightings were made, which included 18 different cetacean species. Acoustic effort included 1m027 sonobuoy deployments and 478 towed array deployments.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex from December 2012 to January 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at three locations: near Santa Barbara Island (880 m), west of San Clemente Island (1000 m), and southwest of San Clemente Island (1300 m). Six baleen whale species were recorded: blue whales, Bryde’s whales, fin whales, gray whales, humpback whales, and minke whales.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex from January to July 2014 to detect marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz at three locations: west of San Clemente Island (1,000 m depth, site H), southwest of San Clemente Island (1,200 m depth, site N), and west of La Jolla, California (550 m depth, site P). Sites H and N are located offshore, whereas site P is located nearer to the coast.

To monitor for the presence of marine mammals, High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) were deployed at two sites within the Navy’s Virginia Capes Range Complex. There were three deployments at one site, located offshore from Cape Hatteras (HAT), between October 2012 and December 2014. There was one deployment at the other site, located offshore from Norfolk Canyon (NFC), between June 2014 and April 2015. Both sites were located approximately 75 nmi offshore in about 1000 m of water.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted within the Navy’s Cherry Point OPAREA during August – December 2011 and July – October 2012 for a total of 105 and 81 days respectively. This site is located approximately 100 miles from the North Carolina coastline on the shelf break. The 2011 deployment was at a water depth of 952 m and the 2012 deployment was at a water depth of 914 m. Acoustic data collected at this site provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with recording cycles of 5 minutes every 10 minutes. The data were divided into three frequency bands and data were analyzed by scans of long-term spectral averages and spectrograms. Four baleen whale species were recorded: blue, fin, minke, and sei whales. The detections of their calls were made between late August and early December 2011. Blue whale calls were the only baleen whale call type detected in the 2012 deployment. No Bryde’s, humpback, or North Atlantic right whale calls were detected in either deployment. Several different toothed whale species were recorded: Blainville’s, Cuvier’s, and Gervais’ beaked whales, killer whales, pygmy or dwarf sperm whales (Kogia spp.), Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes. All species except killer whales were recorded in 2011 and 2012. Killer whales were detected only in 2011. Ship noise was the most common anthropogenic sound in both deployments. MFA was noted during both deployments. A total of 391 pings were detected in 2011 with a maximum peak-to-peak received level of 156 dB re 1 μPa. In 2012, a total of 492 pings were detected with a maximum peak-to-peak received level of 167 dB re 1 μPa. Few echosounder pings over a variety of frequencies (4-80 kHz) were detected during both deployments. Explosions were detected in both deployments, though they were more prevalent in 2011 than 2012. High noise levels, possibly caused by instrument strumming and fluid flow at the sensor, occurred intermittently in both deployments and likely decreased the detection range for low-frequency sounds. This strumming was most prevalent in 2012.

Navy Research Funded Year Three Project Reports

Whales and dolphins use sound for different functions including echolocation and social communication, and thus changes in sound production patterns are a likely component of any behavioral response to anthropogenic sounds such as military mid-frequency sonar (MFA). To simultaneously log whale and dolphin movements, sound production and reception, and anthropogenic sound exposure levels, we used Dtags (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) and bioacoustic probes (Greeneridge Sciences). Tags were deployed on wild, free-ranging cetaceans in Southern California waters. Tagged animals were then exposed to simulated MFA or, as a control, pseudo-random noise (PRN). In total, the August-September 2010 SoCal10 behavioral response study included 28 playbacks: 19 to blue whales (11 MFA, 8 PRN), 5 to fin whales (3 MFA, 2 PRN), 2 to a single sperm whale (1 MFA, 1 PRN), 1 to a Risso’s dolphin (MFA), and 1 to a Cuvier’s beaked whale (MFA). For this analysis we focus first on baleen whale call production and reception rates (particularly blue whale D calls and variable calls) in relation to sound exposure level, dive behavior, and lunge feeding rates. We then examine echolocation-based foraging behavior and social call production by the toothed whales as a function of sound exposure level. This rich dataset, including multiple cetacean species of conservation concern, provides insight into the wide potential range of responses to sound, and the dependence of those responses on ecological, social and behavioral context. Investigations like SoCal10 can help guide inferences for related topics, such as assessment of population effects of anthropogenic noise.

In the Pacific, the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) program maintains systems that continuously run algorithms to detect, classify and localize marine mammals year-round on the U.S. Navy’s deep-water Southern California Antisubmarine Warfare Range (SOAR) in Southern California and the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) off Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i. Long-term archive data collected on these ranges allow for numerous types of studies on species inhabiting the ranges, including the monitoring of abundance, behavioral responses to naval activities, and habitat usage. They also provide the opportunity to study ambient sound levels and soundscapes.

Documenting year-round diversity and distribution of marine mammals off Southern California is important for assessment of effects of potentially harmful anthropogenic activities. Although the waters off Southern California have been surveyed extensively for marine mammals over the past 18 years, such surveys have been periodic and were conducted primarily from summer to fall, thereby missing potential seasonal shifts. We examined seasonal abundance and population density of cetaceans off Southern California from 16 shipboard line-transect surveys conducted quarterly during 2004–08. The study area consisted of 238,494 km² of coastal, shelf, and pelagic oceanic habitat from near-shore waters to 700 km offshore.

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions: Which cetacean species occur within the VACAPES OPAREA off Virginia, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally? What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area? Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years? What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes? Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily move through areas of U.S. Navy live-fire or Anti-Submarine Warfare training events?

Taking into consideration the multiple intermediate scientific objectives in the U.S. Navy’s Strategic Planning Process (DoN 2013b), the goals of this study are to assist the U.S. Navy and regulatory agencies with environmental planning and compliance by addressing the following questions:  Which cetacean species occur over the outer continental shelf to the east of NSN, and how does occurrence fluctuate seasonally?  What are the baseline behaviors and ecological relationships of offshore cetaceans within the study area?  Do individual cetaceans exhibit site fidelity within specific regions of the study area over periods of weeks, months, or years?  What is the seasonal extent of cetacean movements within and around U.S. Navy VACAPES training range boxes?  Do cetaceans spend significant time within or primarily

We report on two sightings of individual blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) off the coast of Virginia during marine mammal surveys. On 11 April 2018, during a vessel survey off the coast of Virginia, a single blue whale was observed approximately 100 km east-northeast of Virginia Beach. On 10 February 2019, another single blue whale was recorded during an aerial survey approximately 135 km east-southeast of Virginia Beach

Blue whale (Balenoptera musculus) occurrence in the central and western Pacific is not fully understood. However, passive acoustics offer an effective way to monitor remote sites. Blue whale songs are regionally distinct, and their stereotyped characteristics may be used to distinguish populations. Most blue whale song consists of multiple, pulsed and tonal units. However, song in the central and western Pacific consists of only simple tonal units. We investigated song variability of Hawaii, Wake Atoll, Palmyra, and Tinian in the Mariana Islands Archipelago, and highlight differences between blue whale songs amongst sites. Song calls of two different frequencies were recorded by High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages. Detailed measures of call frequency were taken along the contours of tonal calls and patterning of song sequences was evaluated for recordings from the four locations during 2012 and 2013. The spatial and temporal occurrence of these patterns is discussed.

A passive acoustic monitoring survey using mobile underwater gliders was conducted from 7 February to 31 March 2020 in the Southern California Bight, with the goal of characterizing the temporal and spatial distribution of odontocetes and mysticetes in the region. Initially, the focus of this Project was on beaked whales. However, upon recovery of the gliders post-deployment, it was discovered that neither glider recorded any useable data above 2.5 kilohertz, well below the frequency of beaked whale vocalizations. It was then decided to analyze the available data for baleen whale and sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) vocalizations, which was originally a focus of secondary importance for the Project.

The effects of anthropogenic sound on marine mammal behavior remains poorly understood, particularly with respect to fine-scale movement patterns. We exposed tagged blue whales to simulated navy sonar during the SOCAL10 behavioral response study in Southern California. We used two different high-resolution, suctioncup digital archival tags to examine fine-scale whale movement: DTAGs and Bioacoustic Probes. The Bioacoustic probe, which included a hydrophone, a pressure transducer, and a dual-axis accelerometer, allowed us to estimate speed and pitch. The DTAGs are equipped with stereo hydrophones, a pressure transducer, and three-axis accelerometers and magnetometers. These sensors allowed us to determine fine-scale movement in three dimensions and received levels of sound. Our study included 19 sound exposures, consisting of 11 playbacks of mid-frequency sonar and 8 control playbacks of pseudo-random noise. We analyzed 24 parameters related to dive and body kinematics for each dive before, during and after sound exposure. Statistical models were applied to assess the significance of changes in these parameters in relation to the received sound level and distance from the source to the whale. During some exposures there were increases in speed and changes in ascent behavior as well as an apparent displacement away from the sound source after the onset of exposure. However, no clear responses were seen in these behaviors for other exposures. Given the range of factors that can characterize behavior and the potential for infrequent or subtle reactions, these data highlight the need for sufficient baseline data and a comprehensive understanding of the behavioral (social interactions), ecological (prey distribution), and evolutionary (fight or flight) contexts in which assessments of sound effects are made. Blue whales produce low-frequency calls and have generally not been considered sensitive to mid-frequency sounds, however, the current study indicates they may respond under certain situations.

In order to support the U.S. Navy in meeting regulatory requirements for monitoring established under the Final Rules and to provide a mechanism to assist with coordination of program objectives under the ICMP, this survey was conducted to confirm the Marine Mammal Monitoring on Navy Ranges (M3R) acoustic detections and marine mammal satellite tagging was prior to a training event, the Submarine Commander’s Course exercise, which would be conducted in the same area during February 2012.This report presents the methods and preliminary results of a vessel-based visual and acoustic survey effort that was conducted in conjunction with a tagging and species-validation project

This report presents a geographic information system (GIS)-based overview of the sighting records obtained during marine species monitoring effort (a total of 12 U.S. Pacific Fleet-funded surveys) to date in the MIRC. Also included are incidental marine mammal and sea turtle sightings made since 1965 on non-dedicated surveys in the region.

Beaked whales (Family Ziphiidae; Order Cetacea) are the least well-described group of marine mammals because they conduct very long deep dives, spend little time on the surface where they display cryptic behavior, and are difficult to identify due to the similarity between species. Beaked whales are also known to be susceptible to high-energy sound sources in the ocean (e.g. seismic research, sonars used by military activities).

An expedition was conducted with the goal of visually locating, acoustically recording, and obtaining biopsy samples of the Mesoplodon beaked whales that were encountered in 2020 and produce BWB pulses, as well as locating the beaked whales that produce the BW43 echolocation pulse in order to conclusively determine what species produce each of the pulse types.

In order to test the possibility of using high frequency pinger tags to track baleen whales on Navy instrumented ranges, three blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and one humpback (Megaptera novaeangliaea) whales were exposed to two high frequency pingers. The pinger frequencies were 37 and 45 kHz, with estimated received levels between 106 and 134 dB re 1 lPa. The whales were monitored prior to the exposure in order to establish their behavioral state and to acclimate them to the presence of the boat. Two of the blue whales were deep feeding, while the third blue whale and the humpback whale were traveling with intermittent bouts of possible foraging near the surface. Each exposure lasted approximately 30—40 minutes, and the whales were observed for an additional two to three surfacing intervals post-exposure. None of the blue whales demonstrated any behavioral response. The humpback whale’s response was inconclusive, as other foraging animals entered the area at the same time; however, it is likely there was no response. These data may begin to provide information on the upper frequency limits of baleen whale hearing, as these species have responded to Navy sonar-like sounds at lower frequencies but similar received levels and behavioral states.

Marine mammal surveys, initiated as part of the CalCOFI cruises in 2004, were continued during 2016-2017. Visual monitoring incorporated standard line-transect survey protocol which includes two experienced observers scanning for marine mammals during transits between CalCOFI stations.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during May 2011 – March 2012 to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. Highfrequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with nearly continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M) and at a site west of San Clemente Island (site H). Data analysis consisted of detection of sounds of interest by analyst scans of long-term spectral averages and spectrograms, and by automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Representative sounds are presented in this report, as well as details of the computer algorithms used to detect them.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted at two sites in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during April 2010 – April 2011. These data provide information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sound sources. High‐frequency acoustic recording packages documented sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with nearly continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M) and a site south of San Clemente Island (site N). For this reporting period, 8,099 hours of acoustic recordings were obtained from site M and 7,779 hours of recordings from site N. Data analysis methods consisted of analyst scans of long‐term spectral averages and spectrograms. The data were divided into three frequency bands and each band was analyzed for the sounds of marine mammal species or anthropogenic sources. Representative sounds are presented.

This report summarizes the underwater sounds detected during a series of deployments of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

This report summarizes data analysis for deployment of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted using High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) deployed in waters offshore of Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida with support from the US Navy during 2016 - 2017. The HARPs recorded underwater sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz. Data analysis consisted of analyst scans of long-term spectral averages (LTSAs) and spectrograms, and automated computer algorithm detection when possible. Three frequency bands were analyzed for marine mammal vocalizations and anthropogenic sounds: (1) Lowfrequency, between 10-1000 Hz, (2) Mid-frequency, between 1,000-5,000 Hz, and (3) Highfrequency, between 1-100 kHz.

This report summarizes data analysis for deployment of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

This report summarizes the underwater sounds detected during a series of deployments of a High Frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) in the southern California (SOCAL) offshore region. The HARP records broadband (10 Hz – 100 kHz) acoustic data, including both marine animal and anthropogenic sound. This report summarizes initial analysis to detect the presence of marine mammals by species as well as the occurrence of naval sonar and other anthropogenic sound events.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July 2010 and June 2011 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 171 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 216 days between 30 July 2010 and 3 March 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, North Atlantic right whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2012 and August 2013 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 853 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 250 days between 24 October 2012 and 30 June 2013. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified odontocetes and mysticetes were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2007 and May 2008 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 162 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes, with the exception of the period from January 1 – 16, 2008, when it recorded continuously due to an instrumentation malfunction, and recorded for 98 days between 10 October 2007 and 16 January 2008. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between May and November 2008 in Onslow Bay at Site B in 232 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 103 days between 30 May 2008 and 10 September 2008. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Vocalizations of blue whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between November 2009 and February 2010 in Onslow Bay at Site A in 171 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 108 days between 8 November 2009 and 24 February 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between November 2009 and April 2010 in Onslow Bay at Site C in 335 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 15 minutes and recorded for 163 days between 8 November 2009 and 20 April 2010. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for two frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, humpback whales, possible sei whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between August 2011 and July 2012 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 952 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 105 days between 19 August 2011 and 1 December 2011. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, possible sei whales, an unidentified beaked whale species, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, killer whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between July and October 2012 in Onslow Bay at Site E in 914 m. This HARP sampled at 200 kHz for 5 minutes of every 10 minutes and recorded for 81 days between 14 July 2012 and 2 October 2012. Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) were created for three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations. Calls of blue whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

The primary objectives of the passive acoustic 26 monitoring program are to: 1) Determine the patterns of occurrence at each monitoring site; 2) Compare patterns of occurrence to better understand distributional patterns; and 3) Document species-specific characteristics of the vocalizations of marine mammal species 30 in each area.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between June 2014 and April 2015 in Norfolk Canyon, VA, at Site A in 982 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 290 days between 19 June 2014 and 5 April 2015. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, possible Sowerby’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between October 2012 and May 2013 in the Cape Hatteras, NC, survey area at Site A in 970 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 212 days between 9 October 2012 and 9 May 2013. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, North Atlantic right whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between May 2013 and March 2014 in the Cape Hatteras, NC, survey area at Site A in 970 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 290 days between 29 May 2013 and 15 March 2014. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, North Atlantic right whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, possible Sowerby’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

A High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP; Wiggins and Hildebrand 2007) was deployed between May 2014 and April 2015 in the Cape Hatteras, NC, survey area at Site A in 850 m. This HARP sampled continuously at 200 kHz and recorded for 217 days between 9 May 2014 and 11 December 2014. The data were divided into three frequency bands (10 Hz – 1000 Hz, 500 Hz – 5000 Hz, and 1 kHz – 100 kHz) and scanned for marine mammal vocalizations using Long-Term Spectral Averages (LTSAs) and automated detectors. Vocalizations of blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, sei whales, North Atlantic right whales, humpback whales, Kogia spp., Risso’s dolphins, sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, Gervais’ beaked whales, Blainville’s beaked whales, and unidentified delphinids were detected in the data.

This report forms part of a multi-institutional monitoring project intended to provide information on the species composition, population identity, density and baseline behavior of marine mammals and sea turtles present in Navy range complexes along the Atlantic coast. This program began in 2007, with baseline aerial and vessel surveys and a passive acoustic monitoring program in Onslow Bay, North Carolina and has since expanded to include study areas off Jacksonville, Florida and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. In Onslow Bay, six years of monitoring have yielded a comprehensive picture of the density, distribution and abundance of marine mammals and sea turtles and provided new insights into residency patterns among pelagic delphinid cetaceans in this region. More than four years of monitoring in Jacksonville have provided similar information on the density and distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles in this area. In Cape Hatteras, almost three years of surveys have provided preliminary information on the complex patterns of distribution and diversity of the marine mammals and sea turtles in this highly productive area. The current report builds on this past body of work and describes passive acoustic monitoring activities that occurred at these three sites between January and December 2013.

In October 2005, the U.S. Department of the Navy proposed the installation of an Undersea Warfare Training Range (USWTR) in one of four sites along the Atlantic coast, for the purpose of anti-submarine warfare training using mid-frequency tactical sonar (1-10 kilohertz [kHz]) in shallow waters. The initial preferred site for the USWTR was Onslow Bay, North Carolina.

Intermediate-duration archival tags were attached to eight blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus; four females, three males, one of unknown sex), and five fin whales (B. physalus; two females, one male, two of unknown sex) off southern California, USA, in summer 2014 and 2015. Tags logged 1-Hz data from tri-axial accelerometers, magnetometers, and a depth sensor, while acquiring Fastloc GPS locations.

We deployed four Advanced Dive Behavior tags on blue whales near Pt. Mugu, California, in August 2014. The tags recorded data at 1 Hz from 3-axis accelerometers, magnetometers, and a pressure sensor (depth), while also recording FastLoc GPS locations. Tag attachment duration ranged from 18.3-20.0 d, recording 1068-2918 dives and 185-2539 GPS locations while attached. Whales foraged near the tagging area for up to seven days before dispersing as far as Ensenada, Mexico, and Cape Mendocino, California. Foraging lunges were detected as peaks in the Minimum Specific Acceleration and Jerk during dives, and foraging effort was summarized by identifying sequences of dives (foraging clusters) with no more than three consecutive non-foraging dives. The median foraging cluster contained 10 dives over 1.6 h bouts (min = 3 dives over 0.4 h; max = 68 dives over 12.3 h). Variability between foraging clusters in terms of median dive depth, duration, and number of lunges per dive likely reflects local prey availability. The number and duration of foraging clusters decreased substantially during more linear travel segments after departure from the tagging area. The area covered by lunge clusters was calculated for two tracks with high numbers of GPS locations (2297 and 2539 locations) to compare the spatial scales of foraging effort. Foraging clusters were generally small (median = 1.2 and 1.5 km2, respectively) and temporally distinct (median = 1.8 h and 2.2 h apart, respectively) for both whales. The two whales were in close proximity (

We fitted movement models to 14 years of blue whale satellite tracking data and 13 years of fin whale data to characterize their movement persistence, with higher move persistence values representing more directional movement and lower move persistence values representing less directional movement. Models were evaluated against a range of physical and biological environmental predictors to identify significant correlates of low move persistence (i.e., presumed intensified foraging behavior). We then used data from a subset of sensor-equipped tags that monitored vertical behavior (e.g., dive and feeding), in addition to movement, to test the relationship between vertical behavior and movement persistence.

Argos satellite telemetry is used globally to track terrestrial and aquatic megafauna, yet the accuracy of this system has been described empirically only for a limited number of species. We used Argos-linked archival tags with Fastloc GPS deployed on free-ranging sperm (Physeter macrocephalus), blue (Balaenoptera musculus), and fin (B. physalus) whales to derive empirical estimates of Argos location errors for these species, examine possible behavior-related differences, and test the effect of incorporating species-specific error parameters on performance of a commonly used movement model.

We conducted 18 aerial surveys in the marine waters around San Clemente Island, California, from October 2008 to July 2013, to obtain both observations of marine mammal behavior and data suitable for developing marine mammal density estimates. The primary platform used was a Partenavia P68-C or P68-OBS (glass-nosed) high-wing, twin-engine airplane. Density and abundance estimates were made using line-transect methods and the software DISTANCE 6.0.

We report 20 photo-documented sightings of a blue/fin whale hybrid between 2004 and 2020, in its wintering and summering ranges in the Gulf of California, Mexico, and southern California, USA, respectively. The whale was confirmed to be a hybrid by genetic testing using a reference dataset of non-hybrid blue and fin whales. It was also tracked by satellite for 28 days in 2015, showing its feeding range extended to the Big Sur area of central California. Information is presented to assist in field identification of blue/fin whale hybrids.

Passive acoustic monitoring was conducted in the Navy’s Southern California Range Complex during March 2012 through December 2012 to detect the presence of marine mammal and anthropogenic sounds. High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) recorded sounds between 10 Hz and 100 kHz with continuous temporal coverage at a site near Santa Barbara Island (site M), at a site west of San Clemente Island (site H), and a site southwest of San Clemente Island (site N).

Passive acoustic monitoring using High-frequency Acoustic Recording Packages (HARPs) was conducted at two sites in the Navy’s Northwest Training Range Complex; one on the continental shelf near Cape Elizabeth (CE) and the other at the shelf slope near Quinault Canyon (QC). The inshore shelf site was monitored from December 2011 until January 2012, and the offshore shelf slope site was monitored from December 2011 until July 2012. In this report, information on the presence of marine mammals and anthropogenic sounds collected at these sites is presented.

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted in the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) between 11 December 2014 and 26 January 2015. The goal of the project was to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of odontocetes and mysticetes in offshore areas south of the Main Hawaiian Islands. The survey was essentially an exploration of offshore seamounts and adjacent abyssal areas.

A passive-acoustic glider survey was conducted in the Gulf of Alaska Temporary Maritime Activities Area (GoA-TMAA) between 11 July and 21 August 2015 (data collection period: 11 July through 11 August 2015). The goal of the project was to investigate the spatial distribution and temporal occurrence of odontocetes and mysticetes in the northern Gulf of Alaska. The survey focused primarily on the shelf break area between Middleton Island and Kodiak Island. The Gulf of Alaska is generally difficult to survey, and thus the knowledge about the abundance and distribution of cetaceans in this area is limited. Any additional effort improves the understanding and awareness of marine mammal occurrence in the GoA-TMAA.

A long-term passive acoustic monitoring program was initiated in 2011 by the United States Navy Pacific Fleet to investigate the occurrence of cetaceans in waters within the main Hawaiian Islands under the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC) monitoring plan. As a part of this monitoring plan, four ecological acoustic recorders (EARs) were deployed at locations around the islands of Ni‘ihau and Kaua‘i, to the west of Kaua‘i. These EARs recorded data over three deployment periods: July to December 2011, January to May 2012, and July 2012 to February 2013. They were programmed to record at a sampling rate of 80 kilohertz (kHz) with a duty cycle of 30 seconds “on” either every 5 or 10 minutes, depending on the deployment.

Group behavior and interactions of endangered blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) have not been systematically studied. Such behavioral data are often overlooked when assessing anthropogenic effects. Yet behavioral data are necessary to compare “normal” behaviors with behavior affected by anthropogenic factors of concern relative to effective management and recovery of blue whales. For a baseline study, we hypothesized that the response variables sighting rate, group size, calf presence and group cohesion (i.e., spacing between individuals within a group) differed according to the spatio-temporal explanatory variables behavioral state, time of day, season, water depth and distance from shore. To address our hypotheses, we flew systematic line transect surveys in southern California and collected focal group data.

Group behavior and interactions of endangered blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) have not been systematically studied. We hypothesized that response variables of blue whale sighting rate, group type and cohesion differed by the explanatory variables behavior state, time of day, season, water depth and distance from shore. To address our hypotheses, we flew systematic line transect surveys in southern California and collected focal group data. Chi-square contingency table and G² analyses were used to assess statistical relationships between response and explanatory variables. Observation effort totaled 87,555 km involving 18 (1-week-long) aerial surveys spanning Jan-Dec 2008-2013. Seventy blue whale groups (117 individuals) were seen, ranging in size from 1-6 whales (mean = 1.7, SD = 1.20). Results supported our hypotheses that blue whale group characteristics were influenced by behavior state and spatiotemporal variables. Sighting rates were significantly highest during summer followed by spring, fall and winter (p

This report documents Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Pacific marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2021 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i.

This report documents the Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Pacific Whale Acoustic Reconnaissance Project (WARP) Laboratory’s marine mammal monitoring efforts in fiscal year (FY) 2023 for Commander, Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) at the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Kaua‘i, Hawai‘i.

OSU conducted a 4-year (2014–2017) tagging and tracking study on eastern North Pacific blue whales and fin whales to determine their movement patterns, occurrence, and residence times within U.S. Navy training and testing areas, as well as NMFS-identified BIAs. Tracking periods ranged from 0.6 to 283.8 d. Blue whale locations ranged from the northern tip of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, to very close to the equator, while fin whales were from Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, to the northern coast of Baja California, Mexico.

Blue and fin whale tagging efforts took place off the southern and central coast of California during one 30-day cruise aboard the research vessel (R/V) Pacific Storm. Nineteen tags were deployed on blue whales (11 LO, 8 DM) between July 14 and August 3, 2016.

This report details the results of three years (2014-2016) of tracking data for blue and fin whales (Balaenoptera musculus and B. physalus, respecitvely) tagged in southern California waters, as well as one season of tracking data for humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) tagged off the Oregon coast. T

In 2015 Oregon State University’s Marine Mammal Institute (OSU/MMI) conducted a second year of tagging operations in support of the United States (U.S.) Navy’s marine mammal studies in the offshore waters of the Southern California Range Complex (SOCAL) portion of the Hawaii-Southern California Training and Testing Study Area as well as the existing Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC), Naval Undersea Warfare Center Keyport Range Complex (together known as the Northwest Training and Testing Study Area). The focus of these studies is to address key science objectives the Navy has committed to complete as part of regulatory requirements promulgated from the National Marine Fisheries Service.

A 2-year tagging and tracking study was conducted on eastern North Pacific blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) to determine their movement patterns, occurrence, and residence times within Navy training and testing areas along the U.S. West Coast.

Twenty-four blue whales [20 location-only tags, 4 Advanced Dive Behavior (ADB) tags] and six fin whales (3 locationonly tags, 3 ADB tags) were tagged in August 2014 between Mugu Canyon, west of Malibu, and San Diego. CA .There was a great deal of individual variation in the tracks of both blue and fin whales, with blue whale locations extending from the northern tip of Vancouver Island in British Columbia to the Costa Rica Dome area off Central America, and those of fin whales extending from southern Oregon to central Baja California

Here, we present a novel configuration of a transdermally attached biologging device called the Advanced Dive Behavior (ADB) tag.

As part of the U.S. Navy’s Atlantic Fleet Testing and Training program, we are monitoring the occurrence, distribution and density of cetaceans at three offshore sites along the U.S. Atlantic coast. We are using an identical suite of survey methods (line transect surveys, photoidentification, biopsy sampling and passive acoustic monitoring) at each 500nm2 reference site. Surveys began in Onslow Bay, NC in 2007, Jacksonville, FL in 2009 and Cape Hatteras, NC in 2011. To date we have conducted 48674km, 60687km, and 14213km of aerial surveys with 6883km, 3403km and 2443km of vessel surveys and 1201 days, 1264 days and 28 days of Highfrequency Acoustic Recording Package (HARP) recordings at Onslow, Jacksonville and Cape Hatteras, respectively